Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Daniel Scanlon's avatar

I'm basically standing in the same place as yourself with all of this. As someone who started out on the truth-seeking journey from the analytical/physics/philosophy side of things and then slowly opening up to wider possibilities, I realize that without a taste of numinous, it's hard to make the jump.

Non local quantum results got me to Idealism got me to some spiritual texts. And that was all super fucking wild and cool and exciting. But, it wasn't 'til I ate some mushroom chocolate (stupidly, stupidly!) after a long night of drinking and a resulting set of crazy energy experiences did I really allow the nature of what your writing about to land. And then reading a lot of the source material you've presented on this new site plus a bunch of others got me to a place where this all becomes the smart money bet for me.

It just became a weight of evidence across multiple domains. And I do wonder how much the personal taste of "impossible" experience is required for most people to get on board.

Love your shit as always. Keep going please!

John Stoszkowski's avatar

Well written as ever pal. And I admire bits of this perspective. It’s just a bit too otherworldly for me in terms of Platonic/Christian metaphysics translated into therapeutic-developmental language. That Earth is real enough to matter, but not ontologically self-sufficient. Apparent existence, deeper reality, hidden purpose, final disclosure, moral destination, etc. Earth being valued as a means to something beyond Earth. I tend to lean more Nietzschean. Could you love existence if nobody designed your suffering? Or if the universe wasn’t communicating personally with you? Or your enemies weren’t assigned to teach you and synchronicities were sometimes just coincidences? His Zarathustra would call Earth Schoolers “afterworldsmen” or “backworldsmen.” Not sure what an Earth Schooler would call Nietzsche!

22 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?