The distinction of 'headism' is important, as it highlights our tendency to favor head intelligence. Iβd like to add that heart and body intelligences are equally necessary. In fact, itβs striking the balance of all three centers of intelligence (like riding a wave, to use your metaphor) that allows wisdom to emerge in us. Iβm working on an article that will outline this in more detail soon. Until then, thank you, Tom, for another great article on a project that deserves our collective attention and support! ππ»ββοΈ
Thanks Tom, my criticism is about the thousands out there who are so quick take the stick to our market based system that has delivered to the majority surpluses like mankind has never seen before. Sure there are the obvious shortcomings you describe. However if you want to be constructive how about a discussion about other market based economies around the world sans the democracy factor?
Apologies if the nuance didnβt come out. The market system is a miracle. But itβs bumping up against its eventual limitations. The transcend and include model implies a higher level of complexity and consciousness at the next stage. For me thatβs incorporating a pretty anomalous idea of attractor intelligence (relevant links in footnotes). Technology is amazing, and we were supposed to develop it. But it needs to be used in service of the system we inhabit. And hopefully will be. It definitely isnβt about abandoning the market: thatβs for stoned kids in the dorm room. Itβs about evolving it.
The distinction of 'headism' is important, as it highlights our tendency to favor head intelligence. Iβd like to add that heart and body intelligences are equally necessary. In fact, itβs striking the balance of all three centers of intelligence (like riding a wave, to use your metaphor) that allows wisdom to emerge in us. Iβm working on an article that will outline this in more detail soon. Until then, thank you, Tom, for another great article on a project that deserves our collective attention and support! ππ»ββοΈ
Thank you! I got that delicious nugget from Philip Shepherd, who would clearly agree with you. https://embodiedpresent.com/blogs/blog/why-you-are-not-living-in-the-present?srsltid=AfmBOoqloYTMJyV3TdPSWw3aZ0tUa7-Qw_2R2v29wNtoMlRKhvmI_PSr
Looking forward to the Brian Whetten interview!
Legit one of the best conversations Iβve ever been a part of. Watched it 4x already.
Kindergarten stuff. I just donβt know where to begin.
Appreciate the feedback. When you decide where to start, Iβm open to a conversation.
Thanks Tom, my criticism is about the thousands out there who are so quick take the stick to our market based system that has delivered to the majority surpluses like mankind has never seen before. Sure there are the obvious shortcomings you describe. However if you want to be constructive how about a discussion about other market based economies around the world sans the democracy factor?
Apologies if the nuance didnβt come out. The market system is a miracle. But itβs bumping up against its eventual limitations. The transcend and include model implies a higher level of complexity and consciousness at the next stage. For me thatβs incorporating a pretty anomalous idea of attractor intelligence (relevant links in footnotes). Technology is amazing, and we were supposed to develop it. But it needs to be used in service of the system we inhabit. And hopefully will be. It definitely isnβt about abandoning the market: thatβs for stoned kids in the dorm room. Itβs about evolving it.
Thanks Tom we might be on the same page after all.
β₯οΈ